Thread: Undertaker or Sting

Overall wrestling ability, entertainment value, promo's.... WHo is the overall best?

Originally Posted by SheltonForWWEChamp

this is easy one Undertaker


Sting is good to i respect him and enjoy watching him in tna but my choice is taker

Did you vote... Nooo DO IT, Mmkay

Why are you comparing Undertaker and Sting? Should be Sting and Shawn Michaels. Sting was loyal to WCW as Shawn was to WWF. Both are considered and called icons. I don't get people comparing Taker and Sting...

But if I voted it would be Taker hands down.

Originally Posted by King_Taker

Why are you comparing Undertaker and Sting? Should be Sting and Shawn Michaels. Sting was loyal to WCW as Shawn was to WWF. Both are considered and called icons. I don't get people comparing Taker and Sting...

But if I voted it would be Taker hands down.

I have a group that I will get to. It's in there... No worries, I wanna give this one time to play out. They are gonna get REAL good match up's trust me.

Originally Posted by darrkzerow

Geez you don't get it? They have been compared since Sting went dark.


Should be.

This Sting


VS

This Sting

I do get it and making the lights go out is all they have in common besides putting in hard work for decades.

Originally Posted by King_Taker

I do get it and making the lights go out is all they have in common besides putting in hard work for decades.

Well, I don't think it has to do with commons... It's about each as an entertainer.