Wrestling Forums - WWE Forums, WWE Discussion
Go Back   Wrestling Forums - WWE Forums, WWE Discussion > Wrestling Forums Domain > WWE Discussion

Reply
[1 (permalink)] Posted by Enzuguri 07-04-2008, 06:00 PM
Quote
I really don't see any other reason as to why WWE would create a new women's title. Women's wrestling has never been that high on WWE's list of priorities and why do we need another belt added to the already 41 belts in WWE? I mean "Knockout title" sounds better and more unique than "women's title" and i can't help but think that WWE caught notice of this and felt the need to create a "divas title" since they refer to their female wrestlers and divas...TNA refers to their females as knockouts. Just my two cents.

Oh and i really hope they have a unification match or something because they need to get rid of the women's belt on RAW to stop the confusion.
Banned
Photobucket
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 587


Enzuguri is offline

 
[2 (permalink)] Posted by darrkzerow 07-04-2008, 06:02 PM
Quote
I thought. Woman's belt was for woman wrestlers. And maybe Diva's belt is for the best Diva. Which is why Victoria didn't win. She should be on RAW, winning that belt.

__________________
BATISTA FOR GM!

THE NEW BAS ASS TEAM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T4vqUWgOPM
BEST VIDEO EVER!
VINCE LIKES PUNK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cs9dqLHG8LQ
VINCE DOESN'T LIKE JEFF
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWyzgAHShd8
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 8,325


darrkzerow is offline

 
[3 (permalink)] Posted by Enzuguri 07-04-2008, 06:05 PM
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrkzerow View Post
I thought. Woman's belt was for woman wrestlers. And maybe Diva's belt is for the best Diva. Which is why Victoria didn't win. She should be on RAW, winning that belt.
That doesn't make any sense :S
Banned
Photobucket
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 587


Enzuguri is offline

 
[4 (permalink)] Posted by Bass 07-04-2008, 06:06 PM
Quote
I kind of thought that too. The only way the Divas title should exist is that if it was only contested by actual divas, and the actual female wrestlers were on RAW. this being said, the prestige of the new title should not be held as high as the womans title. But i heard JR say on SD! that it was the equibvilent of the RAW title

__________________
Main Eventer
 
Bass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Johto
Posts: 1,120

Send a message via AIM to Bass Send a message via Yahoo to Bass

Bass is offline

 
[5 (permalink)] Posted by Enzuguri 07-04-2008, 06:10 PM
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bass View Post
I kind of thought that too. The only way the Divas title should exist is that if it was only contested by actual divas, and the actual female wrestlers were on RAW. this being said, the prestige of the new title should not be held as high as the womans title. But i heard JR say on SD! that it was the equibvilent of the RAW title
Well of course JR's gonna say that, he has to put over the new title. I'd be happier if the women from RAW just went over to SD!, they unified the two titles and the women became exclusive to RAW. The women's division is thin enough as it and we really don't need two titles for them...We might as well bring back two light heavyweight titles while we're here.
Banned
Photobucket
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 587


Enzuguri is offline

 
[6 (permalink)] Posted by TheDragonKnight 07-04-2008, 06:12 PM
Quote
the new title is basically a lower title for the eye candy divas but its a shame cause victoria and nattie should be on raw
Super Moderator
 
TheDragonKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,696


TheDragonKnight is online now

 
[7 (permalink)] Posted by uwcwwe 07-04-2008, 06:18 PM
Quote
no the knockout title was the answer to the womens title theres just alot of divas on smackdown(including ecw)
Gaijin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 46


uwcwwe is offline

 
[8 (permalink)] Posted by Enzuguri 07-04-2008, 06:20 PM
Quote
I don't get this whole "the divas title is for the divas and the women's title is for the wrestlers"...You do realise that the new divas title will be won and lost in wrestling matches! It's not like they'll be competing for it every week in bikini shows and diva dance offs. All female wrestlers in WWE = Divas.
Banned
Photobucket
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 587


Enzuguri is offline

 
[9 (permalink)] Posted by thegreatest 07-04-2008, 06:30 PM
Quote
the womens title iz way more prestigous den dat stupid knockout title the women who held include : The Fabulous Muhlah Lita Trish Status Sherri Martel and now Mickie James Beth Phinox and Candice Michelle
Midcarder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: da D (DEEZ NUTS!!!)
Posts: 117


thegreatest is offline

 
[10 (permalink)] Posted by Mandie Lynn 07-04-2008, 06:32 PM
Quote
They should have one belt held by real wrestlers. Defended on both shows if need be. Until then I think that the actual wrestlers, not they eye candy, should be on RAW, where are real women's wrestler hold the belt. There is a lot of history in the Women's Championship. Bllllaaah. WWE has a whole lot of catching up to do to get to the TNA Knockout division
Midcarder
 
Mandie Lynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South of Boston, Ma
Posts: 353


Mandie Lynn is offline

 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
vBulletin Skin By: ForumThemes.com