| Sponsored Links |
|
Main Eventer
Member
|
I kind of thought that too. The only way the Divas title should exist is that if it was only contested by actual divas, and the actual female wrestlers were on RAW. this being said, the prestige of the new title should not be held as high as the womans title. But i heard JR say on SD! that it was the equibvilent of the RAW title
__________________
|
|
Banned
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 589
Credits: 35
![]()
|
Quote:
|
|||||||||
|
Banned
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 589
Credits: 35
![]()
|
I don't get this whole "the divas title is for the divas and the women's title is for the wrestlers"...You do realise that the new divas title will be won and lost in wrestling matches! It's not like they'll be competing for it every week in bikini shows and diva dance offs. All female wrestlers in WWE = Divas.
|
||||||||
|
Midcarder
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: da D (DEEZ NUTS!!!)
Posts: 119
Credits: 1,000
![]()
|
the womens title iz way more prestigous den dat stupid knockout title the women who held include : The Fabulous Muhlah Lita Trish Status Sherri Martel and now Mickie James Beth Phinox and Candice Michelle
|
||||||||
|
Midcarder
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South of Boston, Ma
Posts: 307
Credits: 1,120
![]()
|
They should have one belt held by real wrestlers. Defended on both shows if need be. Until then I think that the actual wrestlers, not they eye candy, should be on RAW, where are real women's wrestler hold the belt. There is a lot of history in the Women's Championship. Bllllaaah. WWE has a whole lot of catching up to do to get to the TNA Knockout division
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|